Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 15:59:26 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: <freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: FreeBSD Port: vmware2-2.0.476 Message-ID: <009001bfbd1e$1f76a140$931576d8@inethouston.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] I was wondering if support for windows98/95 would be good enough to run them out of safe mode in the near future? Also I have to manually mount the linux procfs manually with the current port of version2, is that normal or is it a bug? It also seems a bit slow, which is understandable and I'm still amazed that you can run another operating system like windows inside freebsd and linux, but I heard some people say that they didn't notice the speed difference. BTW, I get abort traps when I try to put it into full screen mode. [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 5.50.4030.2400" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I was wondering if support for windows98/95 would be good enough to run them out of safe mode in the near future? Also I have to manually mount the linux procfs manually with the current port of version2, is that normal or is it a bug? It also seems a bit slow, which is understandable and I'm still amazed that you can run another operating system like windows inside freebsd and linux, but I heard some people say that they didn't notice the speed difference. BTW, I get abort traps when I try to put it into full screen mode.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?009001bfbd1e$1f76a140$931576d8>