Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:05:29 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com> To: dayton+freebsd-stable@overx.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <200003281805.NAA05866@world.std.com> References: <20000328113633.A28085@cons.org> <002301bf98dc$79ed86e0$0100000a@vista1.sdca.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 12:42:40 2000 >From: Soren Dayton <dayton@overx.com> >Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? >Date: 28 Mar 2000 11:35:42 -0600 > >Is there a good list of improvements? In particular details of >the NFS improvements? I tried looking through the CVS logs, but >it was not immediately clear to me. And doing that for the >entire source tree doesn't seem very efficient. > >Thanks, >Soren Perhaps src/UPDATING? There is a reverse chronological history log there... -kc >"Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com> writes: > >> I'll agree with most of the points you made. When 3.4 was all there was, I >> was content with it, because I've known nothing else. But after seeing how >> beautiful 4.0 can be in certain areas, (my favs are new linux emu threads >> and ATAPI rather than wd0), I would hate to go back to 3.4. In fact, I'm >> upgrading my work's mission critical computer to 4.0-RELEASE. I really >> think it's _alot_ better (as it should be, since it's a X.0 release). My >> opinion, although what people do with their time is none of my business, is >> that it would be best to have everyone concentrate their efforts on 4.0. >> Just my little opinion :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003281805.NAA05866>