Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:25:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 performance issue Message-ID: <20040816102249.X30211@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <200408131647.i7DGlecR016845@ktts.kharkov.ua> References: <200408131647.i7DGlecR016845@ktts.kharkov.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 igor@ktts.kharkov.ua wrote: > The problem is neither duplex nor WITNESS/INVARIANTS. And as I outlined before there is no switch, but a router. > Connection is 1000/full. I checked everything I could 1000 times. I started believing that 5.2 performance of 5.2 is much > worse than 5.1. Its quite possible there was some performance loss. Performance wasn't a big goal during that time frame -- it was getting the locking infrastructure right. In -CURRENT with debug.mpsafenet enabled (and the coming 5.3) you should see substantial improvements. If you have ana extra machine and some time, could you truy building a -current box and giving it a try? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040816102249.X30211>