Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:05:07 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf Message-ID: <20021010064644.C6622-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021009143922.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> > ddb/db_examine.c: db_printf("%-*lz", width, (long)value);
> > ddb/db_examine.c: db_printf("%8lz", (long)addr);
> >
> > Hmm, the second case doesn't even use a sign so it can be %x anyways.
> And the first one doesn't use the '+' modifier either so it can just be
> converted to use '%x' as well. Hmm, more likely is that probably
> these two places should be using '+z' instead of just 'z'. So,
> maybe 'y' instead of 'z'?
'+' doesn't work normally in the kernel. It is a no-op before %d and it
should be a similar no-op before %z (unless %+d is fixed or %z is renamed).
However, it currently has the affect of unbreaking %z.
s/z/y/ seems reasonable.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010064644.C6622-100000>