Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:10:01 -0800 (PST) From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/10534: if_tx.c bridge patch Message-ID: <199903262310.PAA08709@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR kern/10534; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/10534: if_tx.c bridge patch Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:02:59 -0800 (PST) In retrospect, change this line in the patch +#if NBPFILTER > 0 && !defined(BRIDGE) to #if NBPFILTER > 0 You want this because you still want to run the check indicated regardless of the state of do_bridge. But it doesn't have to be there if bpfilter is off (because do_bridge will then turn promiscuous mode on or off as appropriate). It does need to be there if bpfilter is on because do_bridge could be off and promiscuous mode could still be on (because of bpfilter). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903262310.PAA08709>