Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:30:10 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert J. Rutter" <rjr@sparks.empath.on.ca> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Deleted /usr/lib/libgnumalloc.so.2.0 Message-ID: <199609260030.UAA26597@sparks.empath.on.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there an XFree86 Beta G compiled against -current that doesn't need /usr/lib/libgnumalloc.so.2.0? My present recourse is <GAG>... 55 * * * * [ -f /usr/lib/libgnumalloc.so.2.0 ] || \ ln -s /usr/lib/libfakegnumalloc.so.2.0 /usr/lib/libgnumalloc.so.2.0 I'd fix the Makefile but CTM chokes if checksums don't match. Enough disk space for CVS and/or compiling my own XFree86 is not in sight either. Cheers, -- Robert Rutter rjr@sparks.empath.on.ca The thing I really like about Windows 95 is its artificial intelligence. For example, check the properties of any file with the extension "old". Windows 95 will tell you that it is an old file. What other major operating system available today has intelligence that is so artificial?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609260030.UAA26597>