Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:34:21 +0200 (MEST) From: "D. Rock" <D.Rock@t-online.de> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: technical comparison Message-ID: <990614061.3b0b922d5710b@rock.dyn.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <3B0B089A.AA97F518@newsguy.com> References: <200105220411.f4M4BDX101825@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <3B0A8DD5.9A38449B@mitre.org> <3B0B089A.AA97F518@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Zitiere "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>: > Note, though, that there is some very recent perfomance improvement on > very large directories known as dirpref (what changed, actually, was > dirpref's algorithm). This is NOT present on 4.3-RELEASE, though it > _might_ have since been committed to stable. I don't think dirpref should help in this case. IIRC the dirpref patches change the algorithm choosing the cg of subdirectories relative to their parent. Since postmark by default only uses one directory, there should be no benefit. -- Daniel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?990614061.3b0b922d5710b>