Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:41:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Excessive dependancies for OpenOffice 2.0 port Message-ID: <20051107014131.GB57771@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com> References: <200511051218.09945@Misha> <20051107.091446.41674257.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:14:46AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <200511051218.09945@Misha> "Mikhail T." <mi@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > > I'm surprised, you are not objecting to the port's building of its OWN > > C and C++ compiler, as well as a bunch of "small" things like STLport, > > db4, expat (yes, it depends on it, but builds its own too!), sablotron, > > xmlsec, etc. etc. > > People from Debian and others work VERY VERY hard to maintain .. Unfortunately Mikhail hijacked this thread about runtime dependencies. If we can get back to the initial topic :-) What functionality does 'devel/gnomevfs2' give us, and would it be better to make it optional? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051107014131.GB57771>