Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:30:24 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/mirrormagic Makefile ports/games/mirrormagic/files patch-src-main.h Message-ID: <20071106193024.GA27183@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20071106161426.GA91640@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <200711051120.lA5BK1M1068240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071106161426.GA91640@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote: > Rrrrriiiiight, and this happens just when I was looking at the mirrormagic > port and have a couple of patches coming up :) Still, they would be left > for after the freeze anyway, so I guess I'll coordinate them with Dmitry > afterwards - thanks for taking care of the build problem! Sure, feel free to send them directly to me. > But... don't we want to bump PORTREVISION here? The commit added an SDL > OPTION (which I'd also done privately) *and then changed it to default on* > which changes the build behavior - the new binary package will have way > more dependencies and way more functionality than until now. So, should > PORTREVISION not be bumped? I agree. Actually I forget to bump PORTREVISION quite often, but here it really should be bumped. Martin, please? -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071106193024.GA27183>