Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 07:08:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197337] rc.d/kdc missing with WITHOUT_KERBEROS, but Kerberos ports need it Message-ID: <bug-197337-8-zXD9ClCHMx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-197337-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-197337-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197337 --- Comment #8 from Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> --- Then we must use a single rc script in /etc/rc.d/. /etc/rc.d/dhclient might be a template. dhclient_enable="YES" dhclient_program="/sbin/dhclient" # Path to dhcp client program. # or dhclient_program="/usr/local/sbin/dhclient" # isc-dhclient dhclient_flags="" etcetera.... Following this example, our /etc/rc.d/kdc would need to be installed regardless of WITHOUT_KERBEROS as the submitter suggests. To have each port install its own rc.d file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ tying into some kind of kdc_enable rules is complex and fragile given multiple ports and base need to adhere to a single set of rules. Putting control and a single set of rules into one rc script (in /etc/rc.d/) will reduce complexity that multiple ports and base will need to adhere to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-197337-8-zXD9ClCHMx>