Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 21:40:25 +0200 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Joachim_Str=F6mbergson?= <watchman@ludd.luth.se> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, FreeBSD-Audit <audit@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Which mktemp()s are bad? Message-ID: <20001025214025.A71776@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <39F71A84.FF077F4A@ludd.luth.se>; from watchman@ludd.luth.se on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 07:38:12PM %2B0200 References: <39F5DFF7.8ABBAA99@ludd.luth.se> <200010241918.NAA18110@harmony.village.org> <39F71A84.FF077F4A@ludd.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 07:38:12PM +0200, Joachim Strömbergson wrote: > > I'm sorry Warner, but does that "Yes" mean "fix in FreeBSD" OR "feedback > to FSF" ? > An alternative intepretation might be "fix in FreeBSD" AND "feedback to > FSF". > > What's the correct way to handle these situations? > (... And I hope the answer isn't (simply) "Yes" .... ;-) The correct way is to feedback to FSF and wait for them to be imported into FreeBSD. -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001025214025.A71776>