Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 11:20:29 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu> To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal sensitivity problem with if_rum Message-ID: <49FD61DD.7070903@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750905020617y40f62463ma91b46a015b2b2ab@mail.gmail.com> References: <49FA2E3F.9050108@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905010655i5e56282eu240e13f2a03dfb02@mail.gmail.com> <49FB55A3.605@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905011716g39ea55f0kd081bfdd55709b37@mail.gmail.com> <49FBF9B5.40800@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905020617y40f62463ma91b46a015b2b2ab@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That information is misleading, I remmember reading somewhere that linux rt73
> had similar problems like rum but it got fixed, and is not present in
> new kernels.
> I think that problem originated for linux from now obsolete drivers.
>
> On what linux version and what drivers version do you experience
> similar problems
> with signal sensitivity like with rum?
>
>
Hi,
I'm seeing this in ubuntu 9.04 (kernel 2.6.28). It shows more or less
the same figures we have in FBSD.
In linux, Bbp17 can be changed from userpace making iwconfig ${dev}
bbp 17=0. But it automatically restores its previous value. Autotuning
seems to be enable and I don't know how to disable it (the post I sent a
few days ago about this is wrong or doesn't apply).
Gus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49FD61DD.7070903>