Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:31:41 +0300 From: Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_RFC=3A_Renaming_=22FreeBSD=22_repo_in_/e?= =?US-ASCII?Q?tc/pkg/FreeBSD=2Econf_to_=22FreeBSD-ports=22?= Message-ID: <BECBA083-36DC-47E0-AA8C-69A46057D9FC@ketas.si.pri.ee> In-Reply-To: <2008CC9E-9C2F-46C0-9564-911B47E1C377@FreeBSD.org> References: <5d2daa68-cd27-4a56-9d69-5453b588a086@freebsd.org> <D9D55EDC-6136-4EFA-9BBD-4A2935669D06@iitbombay.org> <2008CC9E-9C2F-46C0-9564-911B47E1C377@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On August 20, 2025 9:55:31 PM GMT+03:00, Juraj Lutter <otis@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > >> On 20 Aug 2025, at 20:49, Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org> wrote: >> >> Would prefer shorter names or aliases. This is all FreeBSD related so >> why not just drop the FreeBSD- prefix? > >Having FreeBSD- prefix might indicate that the repository is maintained >by the FreeBSD organization. If there would have been, say, “ports”, that >would be too generic without any distinction. > >— >Juraj Lutter >otis@FreeBSD.org > > would anybody ever think that a image released by fbsd would contain any other defaults than repos by same origin? unsure... maybe if only to not clash with any local repo names? are there serious problems people confusing all this while still being able to use the system? or are there other reasons i don't see here. otherwise we could add ridiculous amounts of "FreeBSD"'s all over the system to make sure everybody truly gets where they arehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BECBA083-36DC-47E0-AA8C-69A46057D9FC>