Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:03:00 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Alexey Shuvaev" <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome reference framework bsd.gnome-reference.mk VS [NO]PORTDOCS Message-ID: <op.ubisnaln9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> References: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 May 2008 11:56:59 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > Hello list! > > I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently > got > an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather > rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now). > What is better, > - to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or > - to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the > control of NOPORTDOCS variable? It's up to you. If it was my port, I would have chosen #2 option since it's very small and I dislike reference framework. If it's big then I possible would choice #1. > The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed > recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome, > it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way > as other "official" gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one > of: > - devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework > - handling docs on one's own? It doesn't has to be only for GNOME. We have glib*-reference, cairo-reference and others that aren't part of GNOME. Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, > Alexey. > > 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.ubisnaln9aq2h7>