Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:02:47 +0000
From:      Joe Holden <joe@joeholden.co.uk>
To:        frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one?
Message-ID:  <45EA44E7.1070907@joeholden.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
frzburn wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm a new FreeBSD user, but a veteran Linux user ;)
> I'm using FreeBSD 6, and I was wondering while I gave a try to rebuilding
> ``world'' how to properly synchronize my source. Here's what I mean:
> 
> After my successful installation of FreeBSD, I looked on
> www.bsdguides.orgfor some tips and... guides. So I learned how to
> properly keep my port tree
> updated with portsnap, with the help of this guide:
> http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/beginners/portsnap.php. It says 
> that
> portsnap is the ``new'' method to keep your ports tree up to date.
> 
> After that, I looked for how to update FreeBSD with the latest packages 
> from
> the STABLE branch. So I looked at the handbook, in the section 21. The
> section 21.3 (
> http://www.ca.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html)
> tells us how to ``synchronize my source''. But it only talks about cvsup
> (and others), not about portsnap. But cvsup is considered obsolete by
> BSDGuides.org...
> 
> So here come my questions:
> Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or must I
> use cvsup?
> If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing my
> source?
> 
> 
> In fact, I'm just looking at the most up-to-date/approved/correct
> technique/tool to synchronize my source for ``rebuilding world'' with the
> latest sources from FreeBSD-6-STABLE.
> 
> Thanks a lot!! =)
> 
> frzburn
Portsnap is only for ports, and as far as I am aware, there are no plans 
to add source functionality.  Either method does the job, what you 
choose is up to you.

Thanks,
J



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45EA44E7.1070907>