Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:42:12 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@queasyweasel.com> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include fnmatch.h Message-ID: <20031217204212.GA31706@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <483CA6BC-30CB-11D8-AAAC-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com> References: <200312170256.hBH2uSOn062945@repoman.freebsd.org> <200312170254.hBH2sTJx062816@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031217132252.GA6018@madman.celabo.org> <20031217133953.GD60229@elvis.mu.org> <20031217140201.GB6018@madman.celabo.org> <483CA6BC-30CB-11D8-AAAC-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:57:45AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:02 AM, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > >The only reason I brought it up is because the absence of FNM_NOSYS on > >BSD for the past decade apparently hasn't been noticed until now (why > >now?), seeming to imply that there aren't any such applications. > > Glad you asked. It's basically my intention to bring FreeBSD's headers > and libraries as close to conformance to Unix03 as I can over the next > few months (years?), Excellent! Then probably we'll see you on freebsd-standards. [...] > Finally, it's never > been bad for marketing to be able to say that "FreeBSD largely conforms > to the foo standard" on the back of the CDs. :-) No disagreements here--- I was just under the (incorrect) impression that facilities marked `OB' in the standard were optional. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217204212.GA31706>