Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:06:47 +0100 From: Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> To: marklmi@yahoo.com Cc: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org>, Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>, freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cgit, ages and chronological order Message-ID: <YZVSx45FLInB2pFP@benson.stsp.name> In-Reply-To: <BCC5C587-7296-47D3-8DDC-311C95637297@yahoo.com> References: <9766b3e1-fb5d-1993-46e2-057e2567315a@gmail.com> <CAJ9axoT6kEwC%2Bt5zHSKPSFgFmaOt8-CXPAG5jsanWobT4LZhpA@mail.gmail.com> <36020FD7-32A4-4869-B6A2-2622F50F6478@yahoo.com> <YZTOE5jPwxXrkgbY@benson.stsp.name> <BCC5C587-7296-47D3-8DDC-311C95637297@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 08:40:30AM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-git wrote: > That is the order of the history on the branch on the > FreeBSD server. It does not follow the Age: Age need > not track the sequencing on the branch on the server. I see. Sorry, I misunderstood the case under discussion. If the displayed commits are already ordered by parent-commit relationships, then displaying commits in that order regardless of timestamp makes sense, of course. Sorting commits by timestamp only matters when parallel commits from distinct branches need to be sorted into a single list for display (as opposed to drawing a graph).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YZVSx45FLInB2pFP>