Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:13:43 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: ale@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tidy flag Message-ID: <20040204.171343.23008681.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <401A1786.9020705@FreeBSD.org> References: <3FFDCE40.20600@FreeBSD.org> <401A1786.9020705@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__4_17_13_43_2004_973)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> wrote in <401A1786.9020705@FreeBSD.org>: ale> > So the question become: should we add the ale> > -preserve flag to tidy-devel or can we replace/remove that flag? ale> ale> I didn't see any answer to my email, so do you agree that it may be ale> removed? :-) Please read the following thread: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=184009+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-doc/20011118.freebsd-doc Since tidy always translates &xxx; into a raw character even when the -raw option is specified, it can break a doc in a encoding other than iso-8859-1. The -preserve option is a hack to prevent this translation, which has been written by phantom@ at that time. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__4_17_13_43_2004_973)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAIKm3TyzT2CeTzy0RAoaJAKCn3ObvgHgr/J4ImQgnnRqTj/SXPQCdFqhd HPCkBAOKLye14i4+oV2ec3A= =zXv3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Feb__4_17_13_43_2004_973)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040204.171343.23008681.hrs>