Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 22:08:31 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r192590 - stable/7/sys/sys Message-ID: <4A17063F.60303@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <200905221507.39476.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200905221754.n4MHs3cr014003@svn.freebsd.org> <200905221507.39476.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-05-22 21:07, John Baldwin wrote: >> Log: >> some ports erroneously use the existence of AT_FDCWD to check for >> the availability of the *at system calls so s/AT_FDCWD/AT_FDCWD_notyet/g >> >> Reported by: Dimitry Andric > > I wonder if it wouldn't be appropriate to just remove the dirfd bits entirely > from 7.x for now. I.e. remove NDINIT_AT(), AT_FDCWD_notyet, the 'dirfd' > member from the structure, the 'dirfd' parameter from NDINIT_ALL(), etc. ZFS > only really needed NDINIT_ATVP(), yes? Are there any plans to MFC the *at() calls? (I'd guess not, since it looks like they change the ABI...)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A17063F.60303>