Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:34:39 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 8794) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409251428430.6730-100000@netcore.fi> In-Reply-To: <y7vzn3fijpb.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] 神明達哉 wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:39:32 +0300 (EEST), > >>>>> Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> said: > > >> 1. do you see massive number of entries with "netstat -rna"? > > > Yes. > > > # netstat -nra | wc -l > > 32468 > > # > > Okay, to be sure, most of them are IPv6 routing entries, right? Yes, 99.99%. > Then please provide some additional information. > > 1. the result of netstat -rnal. A digest of the output is probably > enough, but if you could provide the entire output (on the web, for > example) it would also be helpful. Mailing to you directly off-list. > 2. how did you configure the route to the stf interface? I guess you > installed some static route for 2002::/16 to the interface. The > command line argument (or the rc.conf parameters) that made the > route and the corresponding route entry shown by netstat -rn are > both helpful. The only things I've done are, in rc.conf: stf_interface_ipv4addr="192.88.99.1" stf_interface_ipv6_ifid="::" and in rc.local: ifconfig stf0 inet6 2002:c058:6301::1741 prefixlen 16 i.e., just created the address which added the on-link route. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0409251428430.6730-100000>