Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:19:10 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.net>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-p2p/amule Makefile ports/net-p2p/amule/files patch-configure Message-ID: <4EF98D8E.5040307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111227090920.GA66519@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112251903.pBPJ39SJ037714@repoman.freebsd.org> <1Reu5F-000KFr-GV@internal.tormail.net> <CADLo838hfAz-bwhxvNLbN4yDRhMXwEHdAzSjBMjUx0GczSmDrA@mail.gmail.com> <20111226060601.GA68567@FreeBSD.org> <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo83_A3Vr8i3xit1_6g-dyTNrkbJWGibC3Z4_qLLYdJPtw6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20111227090920.GA66519@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: > Which is very stupid. One of the reasons to use license framework is to > avoid spamming the filesystem with umpteen identical copies of GPL et al. > Unless the port installs some proprietary license file, setting LICENSE_FILE > should not use needed or used. I may agree with you, but not the doc. It should be explained clearer in the doc when it should be set or not. > Yes, ideally, we have to store all common licenses texts in out place, and > create symlinks over there for each individual port (i.e. under > $localbase/share/licenses/<portname>). Ideally? Is this "one of the reasons to use license framework" or not? If so, it should do it, otherwise we have a lame framework and are forced to add LICENSE_FILE to ports with standard licenses. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF98D8E.5040307>