Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:40:53 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla, phabric, and freebsd-arm, was Re: [Bug 200124] x11-wm/blackbox 0.70.1_4 does not build on ARM Message-ID: <1431391253.6170.255.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <55514499.1010001@m5p.com> References: <bug-200124-7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-200124-7-K1TkSx63cG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <55514499.1010001@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 20:08 -0400, George Mitchell wrote: > On 05/11/15 11:26, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200124 > > [...verbiage varies by ticket...] > > > What's the policy on cc'ing freebsd-arm in bugzilla and phabric? Am I > the only one who finds these messages annoying rather than helpful? > -- George I'm of mixed feelings about bugzilla. What would be ideal for me would be if only the initial message about a new bug report went to arm@. That's enough to let anyone interested know about it, and they can go add themselves to the cc list in bugzilla to hear more. I'm not sure that's possible in terms of the admin controls bugzilla gives us. For phabricator, I think an announcement to the list of changes for review that might be of general interest is fine, but phab is too noisy to cc the list on every change to the review. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1431391253.6170.255.camel>