Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 May 2015 18:40:53 -0600
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
To:        George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bugzilla, phabric, and freebsd-arm, was Re: [Bug 200124] x11-wm/blackbox 0.70.1_4 does not build on ARM
Message-ID:  <1431391253.6170.255.camel@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <55514499.1010001@m5p.com>
References:  <bug-200124-7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-200124-7-K1TkSx63cG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <55514499.1010001@m5p.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 20:08 -0400, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 05/11/15 11:26, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200124
> > [...verbiage varies by ticket...]
> > 
> What's the policy on cc'ing freebsd-arm in bugzilla and phabric?  Am I
> the only one who finds these messages annoying rather than helpful?
> -- George

I'm of mixed feelings about bugzilla.  What would be ideal for me would
be if only the initial message about a new bug report went to arm@.
That's enough to let anyone interested know about it, and they can go
add themselves to the cc list in bugzilla to hear more.  I'm not sure
that's possible in terms of the admin controls bugzilla gives us.

For phabricator, I think an announcement to the list of changes for
review that might be of general interest is fine, but phab is too noisy
to cc the list on every change to the review.

-- Ian





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1431391253.6170.255.camel>