Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 12:42:24 +0200 From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NB Acer [3|5]0x and ACPI Message-ID: <20051002104224.GA31056@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20051002090641.GA30719@poupinou.org> References: <20050925080324.27714.qmail@web32809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200509271840.00839.asstec@matik.com.br> <20050930121318.GA19681@poupinou.org> <200509301001.54263.asstec@matik.com.br> <20051002090641.GA30719@poupinou.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:06:41AM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:01:53AM -0300, AT Matik wrote: > > On Friday 30 September 2005 09:13, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > > I will look more deeply what cause this regression. > > > > > > > that is great, I checked this night C2 what you asked for and no change at all > > The problem went away after setting > > hint.apic.0.disabled="1" > into /boot/loader.conf > > so now my laptop use atpic instead of ioapic for interrupt handling. > > I'm not sure at this time if ioapic worked under FreeBSD 5.4. I have to > reinstall in order to check. > OTHO I got an interrupt storm if I unset ioapic, and the bfe0 interface is way too slow. I guess bfe0's interrupt is misrouted to irq9, or the uhc3 to irq10. BTW my Acer is a TM 4102WLMi. Maybe for you this interruput trouble won't apply. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051002104224.GA31056>