Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:31:03 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, uqs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld) Message-ID: <20110120153103.50a86ad3@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20110120201740.GE24444@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20110120201740.GE24444@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/tJbJz3Y5y54zaoX1aOlScX2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes > sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the > WITHOUT_GROFF flag. >=20 > vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could > easily expand the results and commit them to svn directly, alleviating > the need to run vgrind(1) during buildworld. >=20 > OTOH, there are much more useful tools to vgrind(1) for source code > formatting. So do we still have vgrind(1) users out there? >=20 > Regards, > Uli Why it needs to be in bootsrap tools at all? We have build tools for this exact purpose. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/tJbJz3Y5y54zaoX1aOlScX2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFNOJuRQ6z1jMm+XZYRAi6XAJwP4+0SnCuMco2BO68FcKwbpEUz8ACdGdc+ doVyegqquckhx6ekRUcMXFk= =dBMs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tJbJz3Y5y54zaoX1aOlScX2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110120153103.50a86ad3>