Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 03:46:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234559] memory reporting inconsistency 12-STABLE vs. 11-STABLE Message-ID: <bug-234559-227-yYdnXZbdm3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234559-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-234559-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234559 Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #6 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> --- I've thought about this some more and decided to close this bug WONTFIX for now. Basically, we started lazily dequeuing wired pages to avoid the page queue synchronization cost incurred by frequent wirings. The result is that wired pages may temporarily be counted as active/inactive/laundry despite n= ot being reclaimable. Maintaining the previous behaviour wrt statistics would introduce synchronization overhead that we've been trying to avoid in past = and future work. I don't plan to change the current behaviour and there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to do so, at least based on this report. If= you or anyone else would like to discuss this further or describe a use-case th= at depends on the old behaviour, please feel free to re-open the bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234559-227-yYdnXZbdm3>