Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:25:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base? Message-ID: <4C114A52.2060405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C112C6C.50000@elischer.org> References: <201006101346.59824.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C112C6C.50000@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/10/10 11:18, Julian Elischer wrote: | It does bring up the question (yet again) if we shouldn't | have something that is between base and ports.. | the keep base from bloating too much bit to still indicate | that they are supported. Julian, This statement perpetuates the idea that somehow anything in ports is "lesser" than things that are in src, which frankly I'm way past being sick of. The ports tree is part of FreeBSD, period. If you don't believe me, try installing just the base without installing any ports, and then see how much work you're able to get done. Doug - -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMEUpSAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE7DMIALLAQ3oituvWpboIVi3kqkU/ G4jH4tmasyOaWXqP5qH/xtcJDFfbNEKORlDrJem8q0XKluXaw8jZKW+8dgsdBAqJ IcGVfIOWDXID4ZdMAU1wvLiqB3Ozkt0RnOnrgR+lAbstTZlX886HUpPFU0AyNJj3 EQKOIwk2SVAa5Y6lF+NPf/+M56RSnzezgU2QVGYdbnjOLqsl91SEYgBAYQN50sqi meIWJeL3iGuZ0krkkwQ3/zFlKsq5o/x76pClv+yqevVdo/EIRvaG0AfcGEPwXMdO RdN1sMkl8E+2IVpr2ruIwjN8JtAqzkC/6EhOZcvsXheeoKQLgwR4D0O58uvEUPs= =XzyJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C114A52.2060405>