Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:18:07 +0100
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>
Cc:        binto <binto@triplegate.net.id>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Girwatson@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Before & After Under The Giant Lock
Message-ID:  <20071125211807.GA12250@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071125143546.V6583@cauchy.math.missouri.edu>
References:  <474830F9.90305@zirakzigil.org> <6eb82e0711240638g2cc1e54o1fb1321cafe8ff9f@mail.gmail.com> <1188.202.127.99.4.1195957922.squirrel@webmail.triplegate.net.id> <20071125110116.U63238@fledge.watson.org> <20071125143546.V6583@cauchy.math.missouri.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> >........................
> >In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking 
> >granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by better 
> >distributing workloads over CPU pools.  This is important because the 
> >number of cores/chip is continuing to increase dramatically, so MP 
> >performance is going to be important to keep working on.  That said, the 
> >results to date have been extremely promising, and I anticipate that we 
> >will continue to find ways to better exploit multiprocessor hardware, 
> >especially in the network stack.
> >
> 
> I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP 
> has been extremely positive.  I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs, 
> typically lots and lots of floating point operations.  It used to be that 
> Linux beat FreeBSD hands down - now FreeBSD seems to have a slight edge! 
> Basically my program runs about twice as fast when I run two threads as 
> opposed to one - I cannot see doing any better than that!

pure computation does not need kernel operations most of the time.. ie. 
multi-threading kernel wont help much ;)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071125211807.GA12250>