Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206358] [NEW PORT] mail/opensmtpd-extras: porting OpenSMTPD-extras (plugins)
Message-ID:  <bug-206358-13-xN0QrHnH4T@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206358-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206358-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206358

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |feature, needs-qa, patch

--- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
@Andrey

1) Might all the FILTER_* options be better placed in a group, without the
FILTER_ prefix in their name.

2) Might OPTION_CONFIGURE_WITH be more suitable for options that set a
--with-foo CONFIGURE_ARG, so that the corresponding --without-foo is set wh=
en
the option is disabled?

3) The OPENSSL option overrides as port options are probably not suitable,
given the framework has existing methods to override what SSL library is us=
ed.
Otherwise every single port that supported SSL would have these options.

That aside, OPTION_VARS=3DARBITRARYVAR=3DVALUE should be used instead of .if
PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO blocks.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206358-13-xN0QrHnH4T>