Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:05:52 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        "J. Hellenthal" <jhell@DataIX.net>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: misc/155941: mwserv library support is not included in nepenthes.conf config file for Nepenthes honeypot port
Message-ID:  <20110327010552.GA12345@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103262040180.81922@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>
References:  <201103261020.p2QAKGOD082973@freefall.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103262040180.81922@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:43:25PM -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> Out of convenience since I was interested myself and speaking of the
> words honeypot I have looked it up.
> 
> ( make quicksearch key=Nepenthes )

Given sufficient time, I could certainly figure out which port every
PR applies to.  (mwserv wasn't it; net/honeyd would have been my next
guess.)

However, for PRs that include the category/portname as a literal
string, the program that does the autoassignment can do that itself,
and thus save me (or whoever else is examining the PR as it comes
in), that much time -- and get the maintainer notification done
that much more quickly.

It doesn't account for much per PR, but after the first few dozen
a week, it adds up.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110327010552.GA12345>