Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 22:24:20 PDT From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: socketpair bug? Message-ID: <96Jun30.222423pdt.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jun 96 11:13:03 PDT." <199606271813.UAA02652@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199606271813.UAA02652@uriah.heep.sax.de> you write: >See also my Usenet reply: socketpair() basically needs a similar libc >syscall wrapper like pipe(). Right now, it uses the generic syscall >wrapper which is wrong. (The XXX??'s can be removed again then. :) I think the answer is the other way around -- socketpair() works as it is and just needs the two XXX'd lines removed, no need for it to have a wrapper like pipe(). We went through this a while ago and I don't remember the outcome (except, of course, that I didn't commit anything, but that's probably just because I'm lazy) Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96Jun30.222423pdt.177476>