Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:24:22 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: thierry@herbelot.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120921460.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120826030.23985-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > > But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2, > > > > No. > > > > Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?! > Or, even better, 4.0.2 + "suppose-we-managed-to-port-it nvidia kernel module" + nvidia binary 'nvidia' replacement module for XFree-4's 'nv' driver? I mean, will 336/utah be better?? //danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120921460.24090-100000>