Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:43:30 -0800 (PST) From: gh@raditex.se To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/26166: Inserting a route to a specific interface on local network is a problem Message-ID: <200103280843.f2S8hTs59319@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 26166 >Category: misc >Synopsis: Inserting a route to a specific interface on local network is a problem >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 28 00:50:01 PST 2001 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Göran Hasse >Release: FreeBSD 4.2 >Organization: Raditex AB >Environment: FreeBSD merry.sickla.raditex.se 4.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE #14: Mon Feb 26 17:21:15 GMT 2001 root@merry.sickla.raditex.se:/usr/src/sys/compile/MERRY i386 >Description: There is a problem to insert a route to a specific interface on the local network if the route to the net have dissapeard. There should be a switch to "route" to insert the hardware to send to route add 192.168.36.52 -hw 00:80:c8:d3:3c:f4 >How-To-Repeat: ifconfig vr0 inet 192.158.36.51 ping -c 1 192.168.36.52 route delete 192.168.36.0 ping -c 1 192.168.36.52 (Still works since a entry in route table is there) >Fix: ifconfig vr0 inet 192.158.36.51 route delete 192.168.3 ping -c 1 192.168.36.526.0 (don't work) And there is no way to insert the route to the interface in the routing table route add 192.168.36.52 -interface vr0 gives the local ether address in the routing table (This should be resolved by arp?) The net.link.ether.inet.useloopback=0 don't seems to be honored. GH >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103280843.f2S8hTs59319>