Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:03:20 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Jon Dama <jd@ugcs.caltech.edu> Cc: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libc malloc patch Message-ID: <438CEC48.1090902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0511291121360.27754@regurgitate.ugcs.caltech.edu> References: <B6653214-2181-4342-854D-323979D23EE8@canonware.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0511291121360.27754@regurgitate.ugcs.caltech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jon Dama wrote: >I looked into the issues and limitations with phkmalloc several months ago >and concluded that simply adopting ptmalloc2 (the linux malloc) was the >better approach--notably it is willing to draw from both brk and mmap, and >it also implements per-thread arenas. > > Hi Jon, Is there any chance to test the jamalloc and ptmalloc2 ? I would like to see next ten years, we will use a best performance memory allocator. :-) David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?438CEC48.1090902>