Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:29:42 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: terry@lambert.org, phk@dk.tfs.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... Message-ID: <199704112229.PAA12512@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <19057.860797750@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Apr 11, 97 03:29:10 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't have another 10M for another checked out tree, unless I want > > Buy a disk! ;-) Or you could just integrate the patches and I could quit carrying them around. It would save me the cost of another disk and a hell of a lot of wasted integration time, and it would save you the email I send about it... and free me up to work on other things, like queue macro patches. Sounds like a win-win situation. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704112229.PAA12512>