Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:51:04 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> Subject: Re: gcc 3.3.1 Message-ID: <20030921105104.GA42455@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030921024044.GB40126@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030920174627.742be97b.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> <20030921024044.GB40126@rot13.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:40:45PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:46:27PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > Do I have any thing to worry about upgrading versions of gcc, from ports, in > > stable? > > Depends what your intentions are. You can use it to compile your own > code, and most ports, but some ports and the FreeBSD 4.x base system > cannot be compiled with gcc 3.x. I forgot to mention that you'll run into problems if you try and mix and match C++ libraries and code compiled with different gcc revisions (they periodically break C++ binary compatibility). Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/bYKYWry0BWjoQKURAmZdAKDrDcnALSkpnc5oL2CB0h8Q5dkUWgCeNT4E LC24wJ3KNisx3UHk9SABUBQ= =TiGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921105104.GA42455>