Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 12:25:18 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A Demo of rust-in-base Message-ID: <CANCZdfr_b=eQiJyCJGv_13z=hnR74TEB_aBMpUD8UbgOfshYTw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202408041820.474IKjVV050602@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <CAOtMX2gdt8xYyLR3peYWhov-161-6d7%2B8L6TiHCCyw1NQyspXw@mail.gmail.com> <202408041800.474I0HUM050473@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAOtMX2ht0EinR4G56gN6z=gQuJDAHfnE0JPOo7E6hSWC1=dDzA@mail.gmail.com> <202408041820.474IKjVV050602@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Aug 4, 2024, 12:21 PM Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > Alan Somers writes: > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Poul-Henning Kamp < > phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > > If it weren't for my experience with CTL, I would say no. > > > But CTL stuff _cannot_ exist in the ports tree, since the ioctl > interface is unstable. > > Similarly, stuff like the fusefs test suite can't exist in the ports > tree, either. > > It needs to be updated in lock-step with even minor kernel changes. > > How is that different from any other dependency management in ports ? > Or any different that qemu's bsd-user perputually chasing things like struct user... Warner -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Aug 4, 2024, 12:21 PM Poul-Henning Kamp <<a href="mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk">phk@phk.freebsd.dk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">--------<br> Alan Somers writes:<br> > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Poul-Henning Kamp <<a href="mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">phk@phk.freebsd.dk</a>> wrote:<br> <br> > If it weren't for my experience with CTL, I would say no.<br> <br> > But CTL stuff _cannot_ exist in the ports tree, since the ioctl interface is unstable.<br> > Similarly, stuff like the fusefs test suite can't exist in the ports tree, either.<br> > It needs to be updated in lock-step with even minor kernel changes.<br> <br> How is that different from any other dependency management in ports ?<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or any different that qemu's bsd-user perputually chasing things like struct user...</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Warner</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> -- <br> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20<br> phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956<br> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe <br> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.<br> <br> </blockquote></div></div></div>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfr_b=eQiJyCJGv_13z=hnR74TEB_aBMpUD8UbgOfshYTw>