Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:17:35 +0200 From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: Frank Behrens <frank@pinky.sax.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My experience with cpufreq in -STABLE Message-ID: <20050404171735.GR2298@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <200504041645.j34Gj2ow002999@pinky.frank-behrens.de> References: <200504041645.j34Gj2ow002999@pinky.frank-behrens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Frank Behrens wrote: > 1. Thanks to the people providing cpufreq interface and driver. > 2. Confirmation that it seems to work well on -STABLE. > 3. I want to ask the question: Are there are other, more > sophisticated programs to control the current cpu frequency? > 4. If desired I could release the sources for my control daemon, may > be for inclusion in the base system? That requires that I beautify > the sources a little bit, but that should not be a problem. You may start looking at src/usr.sbin/powerd in -current, and improve it a bit? The actual algorithm used in powerd may need some rework IMHO. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050404171735.GR2298>