Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 May 2008 04:16:45 +0900 (JST)
From:      Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        pgj@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Documentation Packages
Message-ID:  <20080526.041645.20101162.hrs@allbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4839AECC.20902@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4839AECC.20902@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_May_26_04_16_45_2008_538)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gabor PALI <pgj@freebsd.org> wrote
  in <4839AECC.20902@FreeBSD.org>:

pg> A few days ago I started to translate the FreeBSD FAQ and I found many
pg> outdated things in it. I do not want to talk about all of these problems
pg> but documentation packages. In the answer of question 2.2 it tells
pg> something about its installation, but I was sorry to find out that none
pg> of them is available at the moment (I tried [1]). What happened to them?

 The doc packages are no longer available because the past discussion
 reached a consensus that generating them is a bit tricky and most of
 people do not need such packages because the latest documentation is
 always available on the web.  It does not mean maintaining them is
 absolutely harmful for something, though.

 I think removing a part mentioning the documentation package would be
 fine for the moment.

--
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Mon_May_26_04_16_45_2008_538)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBIObsdTyzT2CeTzy0RAslyAJwKsch9O6YgvpZ46L659Kn+DziVkACeIeyO
S5bVtrPPxlpPUu7wrBTq5pg=
=ravs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Mon_May_26_04_16_45_2008_538)----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080526.041645.20101162.hrs>