Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:45:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: struct ifnet handling... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980519114346.20170H-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <19980519165637.55180@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
because I ran out of time and some people objsected, because I made references from tha ARP table also count as references and they didn't like that. As you know, doing anythign the 2nd time is always better and this set of fixes should be done a 2nd time. I wasn't completely happy with them. (It also fixes the dangling route problem) On Tue, 19 May 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 01:11:11PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > NO > > I have reference counting patches checked in in a branch > > called WHISTLE_NET_BRANCH_1 > > (e.g. check out the cvs log for if.c, route.c and a few others.) > > It's absolutly needed for dynamic interfaces (endpoints) > > Why isn't this merged to -current? > > Eivind. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980519114346.20170H-100000>