Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:07:00 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 126330 for review Message-ID: <20070912230700.GC63121@heff.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20070912230205.GF4909@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <200709120832.l8C8WLlm085731@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070912150017.GA3553@garage.freebsd.pl> <b1fa29170709121450r5f59430bqa13373fdf807cadc@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10709121530h6d0681c4xa247fe7d31cb2c2e@mail.gmail.com> <20070912223833.GC4909@garage.freebsd.pl> <b1fa29170709121549m7218965fs2682c8b5bd63e58b@mail.gmail.com> <20070912230205.GF4909@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:02:05AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 03:49:55PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: > > Andrew Thompson explicitly asked for the possibility of shared acquisition. > > A flag for callout_init_lock() will be enough? Or it wants it to be > sometimes acquired shared and sometimes exclusive? I think a flag is plenty.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070912230700.GC63121>