Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:28:40 +0000 From: "ae (Andrey V. Elsukov)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D12457: Complete INADDR_HASH lock protection Message-ID: <50499bdc58fd1c85612a5ea34d36d14a@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-em3ftishzefmzreicm43-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ae added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > eugen_grosbein.net wrote in if_stf.c:383 > in_localip() may be better, I just wished to make the patch as clear as possible minizing changes for first revision. Using in_localip() is preferred, because INADDR_HASH is protected with rmlock only in head/ and stable/11. So if you plan to merge this into stable/10, you will need to do direct commit. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12457 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: eugen_grosbein.net, ae, avg, mav, rwatson Cc: bz, imp, freebsd-net-list
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50499bdc58fd1c85612a5ea34d36d14a>