Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:09:53 +0100
From:      "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>
To:        "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why dual boot?
Message-ID:  <011b01c1a659$fb98a670$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:  <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <20020123114658.A514@lpt.ens.fr> <20020123223104.SM01952@there> <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020124213809.00e6e5d0@localhost> <20020125131659.GB7374@hades.hell.gr> <3C51CD33.4E69B204@mindspring.com> <001b01c1a635$636a4170$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C5270E4.BF21F79B@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry writes:

> I don't see any real benefit to the ethnic
> cleansing of hard disks, apart from it
> permitting you to pretend that coresidence
> problems don't exist.

The less complexity you have in a configuration, the more stable it will be.
I note that getting dual-boot configurations to work seems to require effort
far out of proportion to the results obtained.

> You mean Windows NT/XP as your server, and
> FreeBSD as your... your... uh... your...
> reason to buy another machine?

I run NT server as my desktop.  I chose NT server so that I could work with
all the server-side features of NT; I have it configured as a primary domain
controller, too (even though it is the only machine in my domain!).
However, in my current set-up, the FreeBSD machine actually works as the
server; it sits quietly to one side and sends and receives e-mail, and it
holds a mirror of my production Web site so that I can test (I did
originally install Apache on NT for this purpose, and it works okay, but
there are still too many differences between the operating systems to really
mirror the production system effectively--the production Web site being on
FreeBSD, too).  And as I've said, the FreeBSD machine provides DNS for me,
in order to improve performance, since my ISP's DNS servers can be real
slugs at times.

There is much to be said for having two machines.  In particular, it lets
you do all the things that involve one machine interacting with another, and
when you are running a very net-savvy OS like FreeBSD, being able to use all
the network stuff is a huge advantage.  Also, I'm never obligated to drop
what I'm doing to reboot; rebooting a machine to change OS is a clean
sweep--you are not just closing one application, you are completely blasting
all work in progress and moving to a completely different world.  It's like
going from the office to home, or vice versa.  If all you need is one
application, this is a very high price to pay for switching.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?011b01c1a659$fb98a670$0a00000a>