Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:00:56 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, des@flood.ping.uio.no, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions Message-ID: <3699E7F8.CE78A952@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901110926000.6084-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > > If it counts for anything, I'm with DES in this discussion - I especially > like the idea of building either an ELF section containing descriptions, > or an archive with descriptions put into /usr/share/_KERNELNAME_/..., > built during process of building the kernel. Yes? kldload foobar. Where is the description coming from? The _KERNELNAME_ thing has it's disadvantages... -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com If you sell your soul to the Devil and all you get is an MCSE from it, you haven't gotten market rate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3699E7F8.CE78A952>