Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:49:15 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uname -v does not report an n-number Message-ID: <86jz2xkw44.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <aKZyE81Vhy7xn3wG@www.zefox.net> (bob prohaska's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:10:43 -0700") References: <aKXkWktKO1Obbfim@www.zefox.net> <8sr90302-s4s0-1nr6-p9o7-2p9rs5n1s7or@fncre.vasb> <aKYWkfoAxT5gH252@www.zefox.net> <86349liv2l.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <aKZyE81Vhy7xn3wG@www.zefox.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> writes: > Right now /usr/src is a little over 3 GB. The machine could still > function if /usr/src grew to 6 or 7 GB. The exact number will depend on your filesystem. Use ZFS with compression for best results. > It looks like git pull --unshallow will bring in what's missing, will > it give me a sensible n-number? Yes. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86jz2xkw44.fsf>
