Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:36:36 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Lawson <njl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 acpi.4 Message-ID: <20050213213636.GE1102@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <200502132123.j1DLNNrR034501@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200502132123.j1DLNNrR034501@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:23:23PM +0000, Nate Lawson wrote: +> njl 2005-02-13 21:23:23 UTC +>=20 +> FreeBSD src repository +>=20 +> Modified files: +> share/man/man4 acpi.4=20 +> Log: +> Bump date. Reminded by: ru I was also reminded few times... AFAIK date should be bumped when something significant is changed/added/removed, right? I've sometimes problems with telling if my change is big enough to be worth of date bump. Anyway. I wonder do we need '.Dd' at all. We've date of change in $FreeBSD$ already and '.Dd' date isn't visible in man(1) output, so why do we care? We could also do the bump automatically from cvs scripts with some preventing mechanism like "Don't touch date: please" (ugly, I know). We should care about our time, mostly ru@'s in this case:) --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCD8hkForvXbEpPzQRAli7AKDxm5QHOgmapUF89zlkddzQ5dVbpQCgj3XQ ZWP2hTy+VWQm4YFLK/vlq3s= =9tHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050213213636.GE1102>