Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 19:34:27 -0400 From: parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: awk/gawk Message-ID: <20030516233427.GA15789@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20030516213100.GB67874@sunbay.com> References: <20030516173851.GA90719@intruder.bmah.org> <20030516200111.GD57559@sunbay.com> <3EC5575E.2090006@math.missouri.edu> <20030516213100.GB67874@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <20030516213100.GB67874@sunbay.com>, wrote Ruslan Ermilov thusly... > > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 04:25:50PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > wrote: > > > > Shouldn't one also do s/gawk/awk to the awk.1 man page as well? > > > Yes, probably, if we so much care about RELENG_4 these days. ;) Please not do above s/// blindly, whoever is responsible for the change. There needs to be some text which gives a non-subtle hint that awk is GNU-awk, a hint little bit more direct than the one present in the grep(1) man page. - parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030516233427.GA15789>