Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:56:49 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Boris Popov <bp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) Message-ID: <20000426075649.B75904@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:47:29PM %2B0930 References: <20000426102521.C38026@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252235470.331-100000@picnic.mat.net> <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000426 05:25], Greg Lehey (grog@lemis.com) wrote: I think the other points are quite good. But I wonder about this one: >X. Install the kernel and its modules in a subdirectory. I'd suggest > we call the subdirectory /kernel/, so we can rename the > subdirectories on install the way we currently rename the kernel > itself. What do we call the kernel? How about /kernel/FreeBSD? What's wrong with installing kernel in / and the modules under /modules? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Hope springs eternal... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000426075649.B75904>