Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:30:30 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> To: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> Cc: questions-list freebsd <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long Message-ID: <524E6086.5080809@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <CAJ5UdcNDgB4HsjApTnn0fUJmx1s2PMRhU-F9L=QA4w9OjSMskQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ5UdcM8dtrz-PHer9M1jdH8N_MOkd8G-fTc=v5i_4Dn4ngK2w@mail.gmail.com> <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CAJ5UdcPhj8a0vUK6E6nDg_=ajKC85k44D5UT=M%2BhmD7PF=ZMeA@mail.gmail.com> <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CAJ5UdcNDgB4HsjApTnn0fUJmx1s2PMRhU-F9L=QA4w9OjSMskQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/03/2013 20:28, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting > out messages that lib....pixman.so is missing :( > > I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then > run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of > it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up > with texlive-?????-?????-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in > fixing this issue. I have 2 machines working and 2 not working > because of this. I am running out of ideas. Is there another way to > fix this issue manually, i.e, going to /usr/ports/x11/pixman and > rebuilding it there or have to go one by one? Is it vital to use the texlive ports you get via portshaker or could you switch to TEX_DEFAULT=texlive and use the texlive 2012 from official ports (which has a few huge instead of many tiny packages)? (If you want to switch, remove everything starting with texlive, check out a fresh ports tree without portshaker, since there is at least one port with the same name, and install print/texlive-full and maybe print/texlive-docs.) Cheers, Jan Henrik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?524E6086.5080809>