Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:07:11 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD Message-ID: <18141.1148803631@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 May 2006 18:05:43 PDT." <4478F767.5090403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4478F767.5090403@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: >At first glance I don't see anything wrong with that logic. My one request >is that you add a branch that says, "if legacy behavior is requested by ><some configuration method>, add it to the mix." Legacy behaviour is exactly what we need to avoid to get the device locking sorted out, so this would be rather poisonous to the entire effort. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18141.1148803631>