Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:52:48 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/top machine.c Message-ID: <20050418095248.GA12892@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20050418063659.GB85819@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200504161543.j3GFhclO075103@repoman.freebsd.org> <86acnyd2k7.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050416191436.G68941@fledge.watson.org> <863btq4k9m.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050417110321.GA78636@gothmog.gr> <20050417222313.K946@epsplex.bde.org> <20050417135844.GA792@gothmog.gr> <20050418063659.GB85819@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-04-17 23:36, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: >On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:58:45PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> We can add a new toggle command to top, i.e. 'C', that toggles between >> displaying WCPU or CPU. This should regain us a lot of the space lost >> from COMMAND after I added THR. > > Please no. Both CPU & WCPU are quite useful on SMP systems. > I would truncate the username before loosing either CPU or WCPU. > There's a very low possibility that I couldn't figure out the user even > if 1-2 characters were trunated from it. I see. But are they _both_ useful at the same time? If yes, then there is little we can do to enough some horizontal space for a thread count column. Would it be ok, then, if I made the 'C' command tri-state, alternating between three different output styles? ps.thread Output style 0 Only CPU 1 Only WCPU 2 Both
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050418095248.GA12892>